Saltar para: Post [1], Comentários [2], Pesquisa e Arquivos [3]




An open letter to Europe

por Estado Sentido, em 10.02.12

 

When Mrs. Merkel was elected German Chancellor, she saw her predecessor Gerard Schroeder leaving for a profitable position provided by the questionable Russian democracy. Gas was the motive of that influence peddling and Europe is now at the mercy of Mr. Putin. Chancellor Merkel travels to China and Portuguese-speaking African countries. For clearly commercial purposes, Mrs. Merkel goes to Brazil and other South American countries, some of which are democracies that strangely resemble the Bonapartist model. Never mind the ethical arguments, because the business world does not stop at trifles, especially if Mercedes Benz or any other large German company can charge attractive dividends by exchanging technology for cash.

 

The CDU-SPD duo in the persons of Merkel and Schulz does not have a centennial historical memory that could allow them to look with some caution at the relations that a country like Portugal, nine centuries old, has established for over half a millennium with other continents. When the Portuguese arrived in China, the geographical expression of Germany lived fratricidal religious wars and its hundreds of micro-states were fighting for tiny portions of land, a piece of river that could offer a slight advantage over the others. All this in a framework of an illusory I Reich destroyed two hundred years ago by another European project, undoubtedly as imperial as the one some now seem to desire. France, that now follows Berlin’s purposes, had its brief moment of glory for a decade – actually undermined in Portuguese territory, where together with its traditional British ally Portugal fought and won for true freedom in the Europe of nations. Germany itself, the recent creation of just over a century, benefited from this Luso-British sacrifice, hearing the birth of its national consciousness in the bells tolled in Lisbon, Rio de Janeiro and London’s victory celebrations.

 

Portugal has its own foreign policy, not depleted in mere accounting exercises or transfers of funds. Unlike twenty-five other states of the European Union, our language, just like English, is spoken in four continents, the very ones that today's German businessmen and politicians ambition having as business partners. Portugal can, should and must participate in this effort to modernize and diversify its economy, which unlike Germany, will further complement the existing deep cultural relations with Africa, Asia and America. Never have the Portuguese allowed the imposition of Continental Blockades, free trade prohibitions or outrageous limitations of its sovereignty. The communitarian Europe that Portugal joined was the one that existed in 1985, very different in purposes and fundamentals from the Europe that some want to impose nowadays, countering the national sovereignties and identities and forgetting that only these allow for the international expression of the different peoples’ wills, formulated through the democratic institutions where they feel truly represented. It is through the plurality of belongings and the diversification of external relations that European states can best contribute to fulfil the Universalist vocation of the European Union in face of the challenges posed by globalization.

 

Germans must be warned of the dangers arising from the ignorance and adventurous spirit of their unconscious leaders. This is certainly a task for one of the three oldest countries in the Old Continent, precisely the one that has made Europe known to the world.

 

Miguel Castelo-Branco

Nuno Castelo-Branco

Samuel de Paiva Pires

publicado às 00:21


23 comentários

Sem imagem de perfil

De Carlos Velasco a 10.02.2012 às 14:58

Mr. JeanD,

If you want a federation, that's your problem, but you have no right to impose it on us, intervening with our affairs as you did and keep doing. The same agents that are promoting the so called federation, that is not a federation, but a centralized government that wants to rule even the size of bananas and oranges, financed and supported would be tirants in portuguese Africa, in order to get better contracts from the dictators they imposed on african portuguese, with the result of 3 millions lives destroyed, and the parties that established a fake democracy here in order to destroy our industries, our agriculture and our armed forces, establishing a socialist system that survived thanks to indebtment to the big banks that promote the so called european union, the same indebtment that some federalists now want to use as a justification to take what survived of our sovereignty.
You started the world wars that destroyed the european power and served as a justification to this so called union, not we, and that's our right to say no to it. The examples you use, USA and Switzerland, are bad examples. In Switzerland there is no central government rulling the internal affairs of every canton, but only a weak government responsible for financial, trade and foreing policy matters, and by the way, Switzerland, were the people are really sovereign, doesn't belong to any multinational institution and rejects to be part of this so called union. Why? Because swiss know what a real federation means, and that's not what you are trying to impose.
In the USA, were the many states have the same cultural backgound, the federation had to shed blood to survive, killing about 600 thousand people, and serves as a good example of how, even when there is a good constitution, the federal government is a danger to democracy and the traditional liberties. On the contrary, the so called Lisbon Treaty serves any purpose and it's contradictions, that resemble the contradictions that are found in the constitutions of every totalitarian polity,  are a proof of the dangers this super-government impose to the liberties of every european, and we had a taste of the methods used by the so called federalists in the irish referenda, not to speak about the rejection of the dutch and french will when they voted to the project of constitution, latter changed into the newspeak version of constitucional treaty. The means serve to warn us about the ends, that´s a lesson history teaches.
To finnish my observations, would be good to remind that french people grow tired of this project, and that's true also about germans. Don't try to make us believe that the project of some minorities represents the will of France and Germany. But if these stupid elites keep on this track, I can tell you that the result will be the return of hatred between the european peoples, as we see now in Greece, were german flags, for the first time in many decades, are happily burned.
About the ignorance of our leaders, I share your view. If they were not corrupt and ignorant, we would be in the same position occupied by Norway, or even better: if there is any federation we should belong, that's a portuguese atlantic federation.
If by chance i'd been rude by words, i don't apologize. I the defense of my interests against totalitarian minded people, I give a damn to good manners.












 
Sem imagem de perfil

De Jean D a 10.02.2012 às 17:55

Rather than answering you, i checked your blog and decided to apply Rule N°1 on the Internet: Don't Feed The Troll.


For other readers, i send you to his page "ogladio", i don't think any rational dispute could be set judging from the rules on the right...

Comentar post







Arquivo

  1. 2025
  2. J
  3. F
  4. M
  5. A
  6. M
  7. J
  8. J
  9. A
  10. S
  11. O
  12. N
  13. D
  14. 2024
  15. J
  16. F
  17. M
  18. A
  19. M
  20. J
  21. J
  22. A
  23. S
  24. O
  25. N
  26. D
  27. 2023
  28. J
  29. F
  30. M
  31. A
  32. M
  33. J
  34. J
  35. A
  36. S
  37. O
  38. N
  39. D
  40. 2022
  41. J
  42. F
  43. M
  44. A
  45. M
  46. J
  47. J
  48. A
  49. S
  50. O
  51. N
  52. D
  53. 2021
  54. J
  55. F
  56. M
  57. A
  58. M
  59. J
  60. J
  61. A
  62. S
  63. O
  64. N
  65. D
  66. 2020
  67. J
  68. F
  69. M
  70. A
  71. M
  72. J
  73. J
  74. A
  75. S
  76. O
  77. N
  78. D
  79. 2019
  80. J
  81. F
  82. M
  83. A
  84. M
  85. J
  86. J
  87. A
  88. S
  89. O
  90. N
  91. D
  92. 2018
  93. J
  94. F
  95. M
  96. A
  97. M
  98. J
  99. J
  100. A
  101. S
  102. O
  103. N
  104. D
  105. 2017
  106. J
  107. F
  108. M
  109. A
  110. M
  111. J
  112. J
  113. A
  114. S
  115. O
  116. N
  117. D
  118. 2016
  119. J
  120. F
  121. M
  122. A
  123. M
  124. J
  125. J
  126. A
  127. S
  128. O
  129. N
  130. D
  131. 2015
  132. J
  133. F
  134. M
  135. A
  136. M
  137. J
  138. J
  139. A
  140. S
  141. O
  142. N
  143. D
  144. 2014
  145. J
  146. F
  147. M
  148. A
  149. M
  150. J
  151. J
  152. A
  153. S
  154. O
  155. N
  156. D
  157. 2013
  158. J
  159. F
  160. M
  161. A
  162. M
  163. J
  164. J
  165. A
  166. S
  167. O
  168. N
  169. D
  170. 2012
  171. J
  172. F
  173. M
  174. A
  175. M
  176. J
  177. J
  178. A
  179. S
  180. O
  181. N
  182. D
  183. 2011
  184. J
  185. F
  186. M
  187. A
  188. M
  189. J
  190. J
  191. A
  192. S
  193. O
  194. N
  195. D
  196. 2010
  197. J
  198. F
  199. M
  200. A
  201. M
  202. J
  203. J
  204. A
  205. S
  206. O
  207. N
  208. D
  209. 2009
  210. J
  211. F
  212. M
  213. A
  214. M
  215. J
  216. J
  217. A
  218. S
  219. O
  220. N
  221. D
  222. 2008
  223. J
  224. F
  225. M
  226. A
  227. M
  228. J
  229. J
  230. A
  231. S
  232. O
  233. N
  234. D
  235. 2007
  236. J
  237. F
  238. M
  239. A
  240. M
  241. J
  242. J
  243. A
  244. S
  245. O
  246. N
  247. D

Links

Estados protegidos

  •  
  • Estados amigos

  •  
  • Estados soberanos

  •  
  • Estados soberanos de outras línguas

  •  
  • Monarquia

  •  
  • Monarquia em outras línguas

  •  
  • Think tanks e organizações nacionais

  •  
  • Think tanks e organizações estrangeiros

  •  
  • Informação nacional

  •  
  • Informação internacional

  •  
  • Revistas