Saltar para: Posts [1], Pesquisa e Arquivos [2]

An open letter to Europe on the AECR website

por Estado Sentido, em 10.02.12

The Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists published a brief article on the recent statements by German politicians on Portuguese political decisions, with a reference to our letter:


«Martin Schulz and Angela Merkel have angered the Portuguese authorities in recent days with their comments about the actions of Portuguese officials. In a debate in Brussels' Solvay Library on 1st February, Schulz, President of the European Parliament, criticised the Portuguese Prime Minister's trip to Angola in November 2011, saying, “That is the future of Portugal, a decline, also a social danger for people, if we do not understand that economically, and above all with our stable democratic model together with our economic stability, we will only stand a chance within the framework of the EU”. The debate was aired on German television channel Phoenix on Sunday night. Nuno Melo, Partido Popular MEP, said that Mr Schulz's comments revealed "ignorance and prejudice".

Watch the video of Schulz's comments here (at the bottom of the page).

At a lecture given in Berlin on Tuesday, the German Chancellor criticised the Portuguese application of EU structural funds in Madeira. She said,“Those who have been to Madeira can see where the European structural funds were applied. There are plenty of nice tunnels and motorways, but that didn’t contribute towards increasing competitiveness“. Meanwhile, German finance minister Wolfgang Schäuble was filmed in conversation with Portuguese finance minister Vítor Gaspar hinting at a second Portuguese bailout.

Three Portuguese bloggers, a political scientist and two historians, have reacted to these comments with 'An open letter to Europe', highlighting the double standards and hypocrisy of Merkel and Schulz's comments.»

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

publicado às 16:41

An open letter to Europe

por Estado Sentido, em 10.02.12


When Mrs. Merkel was elected German Chancellor, she saw her predecessor Gerard Schroeder leaving for a profitable position provided by the questionable Russian democracy. Gas was the motive of that influence peddling and Europe is now at the mercy of Mr. Putin. Chancellor Merkel travels to China and Portuguese-speaking African countries. For clearly commercial purposes, Mrs. Merkel goes to Brazil and other South American countries, some of which are democracies that strangely resemble the Bonapartist model. Never mind the ethical arguments, because the business world does not stop at trifles, especially if Mercedes Benz or any other large German company can charge attractive dividends by exchanging technology for cash.


The CDU-SPD duo in the persons of Merkel and Schulz does not have a centennial historical memory that could allow them to look with some caution at the relations that a country like Portugal, nine centuries old, has established for over half a millennium with other continents. When the Portuguese arrived in China, the geographical expression of Germany lived fratricidal religious wars and its hundreds of micro-states were fighting for tiny portions of land, a piece of river that could offer a slight advantage over the others. All this in a framework of an illusory I Reich destroyed two hundred years ago by another European project, undoubtedly as imperial as the one some now seem to desire. France, that now follows Berlin’s purposes, had its brief moment of glory for a decade – actually undermined in Portuguese territory, where together with its traditional British ally Portugal fought and won for true freedom in the Europe of nations. Germany itself, the recent creation of just over a century, benefited from this Luso-British sacrifice, hearing the birth of its national consciousness in the bells tolled in Lisbon, Rio de Janeiro and London’s victory celebrations.


Portugal has its own foreign policy, not depleted in mere accounting exercises or transfers of funds. Unlike twenty-five other states of the European Union, our language, just like English, is spoken in four continents, the very ones that today's German businessmen and politicians ambition having as business partners. Portugal can, should and must participate in this effort to modernize and diversify its economy, which unlike Germany, will further complement the existing deep cultural relations with Africa, Asia and America. Never have the Portuguese allowed the imposition of Continental Blockades, free trade prohibitions or outrageous limitations of its sovereignty. The communitarian Europe that Portugal joined was the one that existed in 1985, very different in purposes and fundamentals from the Europe that some want to impose nowadays, countering the national sovereignties and identities and forgetting that only these allow for the international expression of the different peoples’ wills, formulated through the democratic institutions where they feel truly represented. It is through the plurality of belongings and the diversification of external relations that European states can best contribute to fulfil the Universalist vocation of the European Union in face of the challenges posed by globalization.


Germans must be warned of the dangers arising from the ignorance and adventurous spirit of their unconscious leaders. This is certainly a task for one of the three oldest countries in the Old Continent, precisely the one that has made Europe known to the world.


Miguel Castelo-Branco

Nuno Castelo-Branco

Samuel de Paiva Pires

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

publicado às 00:21


  1. 2018
  2. J
  3. F
  4. M
  5. A
  6. M
  7. J
  8. J
  9. A
  10. S
  11. O
  12. N
  13. D
  14. 2017
  15. J
  16. F
  17. M
  18. A
  19. M
  20. J
  21. J
  22. A
  23. S
  24. O
  25. N
  26. D
  27. 2016
  28. J
  29. F
  30. M
  31. A
  32. M
  33. J
  34. J
  35. A
  36. S
  37. O
  38. N
  39. D
  40. 2015
  41. J
  42. F
  43. M
  44. A
  45. M
  46. J
  47. J
  48. A
  49. S
  50. O
  51. N
  52. D
  53. 2014
  54. J
  55. F
  56. M
  57. A
  58. M
  59. J
  60. J
  61. A
  62. S
  63. O
  64. N
  65. D
  66. 2013
  67. J
  68. F
  69. M
  70. A
  71. M
  72. J
  73. J
  74. A
  75. S
  76. O
  77. N
  78. D
  79. 2012
  80. J
  81. F
  82. M
  83. A
  84. M
  85. J
  86. J
  87. A
  88. S
  89. O
  90. N
  91. D
  92. 2011
  93. J
  94. F
  95. M
  96. A
  97. M
  98. J
  99. J
  100. A
  101. S
  102. O
  103. N
  104. D
  105. 2010
  106. J
  107. F
  108. M
  109. A
  110. M
  111. J
  112. J
  113. A
  114. S
  115. O
  116. N
  117. D
  118. 2009
  119. J
  120. F
  121. M
  122. A
  123. M
  124. J
  125. J
  126. A
  127. S
  128. O
  129. N
  130. D
  131. 2008
  132. J
  133. F
  134. M
  135. A
  136. M
  137. J
  138. J
  139. A
  140. S
  141. O
  142. N
  143. D
  144. 2007
  145. J
  146. F
  147. M
  148. A
  149. M
  150. J
  151. J
  152. A
  153. S
  154. O
  155. N
  156. D


Estados protegidos

  • Estados amigos

  • Estados soberanos

  • Estados soberanos de outras línguas

  • Monarquia

  • Monarquia em outras línguas

  • Think tanks e organizações nacionais

  • Think tanks e organizações estrangeiros

  • Informação nacional

  • Informação internacional

  • Revistas